LEAF rubric

CriteriaDescription4321
Alignment with this year’s LEAF themesThe degree to which the project is focused on this year’s themes.The project is very clearly connected to this year’s themes.The project is somewhat connected to some aspect of this year’s themes.The project is tangentially connected to this year’s themes.There is no apparent connection to this year’s themes.
CollaborationThe project involves more than one person.This is a collaborative project from one or more units/programs/departments.This is a collaborative project of a team of individuals or a single unit/program/ department.This is a project from a single individual.Not applicable.
Connection to Scholarly LiteratureThe degree to which the proposal situates the project within the relevant literature and provides a clear conceptual framework.The proposal clearly and thoroughly describes the relevant literature and explains how the project is grounded in and will contribute to the literature.The proposal provides an overview of the relevant literature and explains how the project is grounded in the literature.The proposal briefly references the relevant literature and provides a limited explanation of how the project is grounded in the literature.The proposal does not describe the relevant literature, nor does it explain how the project is grounded in the literature.
Assessment & EvaluationThe assessment/ evaluation component of the project is present.The methodology for assessing/ evaluating the success of the project is clearly and extensively articulated.The methodology for assessing/ evaluating the success of the project is articulated.The methodology for assessing/ evaluating the success of the project is vaguely articulated.No methodology for assessing/ evaluating the success of the project is articulated in the proposal.
TransferabilityThe transferability of the project’s idea or concept to other units.The proposal clearly and specifically articulates how the project can be used by other units (with specific examples).The proposal articulates how the project can be used by other units but without specific examples.The idea that other units could use the project is vaguely articulated.There is no articulation of how other units could make use of the project.
U of T ResourcesThe degree to which the project leverages existing resources and mechanisms at U of T.The proposal comprehensively identifies U of T resources or services that could be leveraged to support the project and specifies those that will be used.The proposal articulates some U of T resources or services that could be used to support the project.The proposal vaguely articulates U of T resources or services that could be used to support the project.The proposal fails to articulate any U of T resources or services that could be used to support the project.
BudgetThe appropriateness and justification of the budget.The proposal clearly presents a budget that is appropriately aligned with the project and articulates a strong justification.The proposal articulates a budget that is nominally aligned with the proposal, both in terms of appropriateness and justification.The proposal presents a weakly aligned budget.The proposal presents an impractical or unreasonable budget.
SustainabilityThe specificity of a plan for the long-term sustainability of the initiative.The proposal clearly and specifically articulates the long-term mode of sustainability for the project.The proposal articulates a mode of sustainability for the project.The proposal contains only a vague notion of how the project will be sustained beyond the terms of the funding.The proposal does not articulate how the project will be sustained beyond the terms of the funding.
FeasibilityThe likelihood of producing the planned deliverables based on proposed timelines and resources.The proposal presents a feasible and appropriately-resourced plan for achieving the project plan.The proposal presents a project plan that is likely to achieve the proposed outputs/outcomes.The proposal presents a project plan that is imprecise and raises significant questions regarding feasibility.The proposal does not present a plan that is likely to be completed given the project plan and resources put forward.